<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Flash or not to Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/</link>
	<description>Distracting the Mind with Information Overload</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-17128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 16:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/#comment-17128</guid>
		<description>Flash has got so bad (at least on sites that I visit) that I&#039;m now using &#039;flash block&#039; add-on in my Firefox.  Now sites load much quicker and I can open the flash content at my discretion.  Still, you are absolutely correct about such content being more of a hindrance than help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash has got so bad (at least on sites that I visit) that I&#8217;m now using &#8216;flash block&#8217; add-on in my Firefox.  Now sites load much quicker and I can open the flash content at my discretion.  Still, you are absolutely correct about such content being more of a hindrance than help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-15759</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/#comment-15759</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. It&#039;s one of these cases where &quot;less is more&quot; isn&#039;t it. My advice is always to keep things as simple as possible but most Flash designers seem to miss this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. It&#8217;s one of these cases where &#8220;less is more&#8221; isn&#8217;t it. My advice is always to keep things as simple as possible but most Flash designers seem to miss this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-14776</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/06/20/to-flash-or-not-to-flash/#comment-14776</guid>
		<description>I agree poor usability drives me crazy.  Most flash is worthless dazzle that adds nothing.  As you mention, using it can add value but so often it is done poorly and just makes me go elsewhere.  Web developers really should understand the ideas on useit.com and uie.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree poor usability drives me crazy.  Most flash is worthless dazzle that adds nothing.  As you mention, using it can add value but so often it is done poorly and just makes me go elsewhere.  Web developers really should understand the ideas on useit.com and uie.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

