<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple in the news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/</link>
	<description>Distracting the Mind with Information Overload</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-13362</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/#comment-13362</guid>
		<description>@Steph: Thanks for your comment.

You&#039;re right. It did strike me as being a bit strange when the press release talked about &quot;Web 2.0&quot; applications and my through were, &quot;maybe the whole UI is one big web app&quot;. I should have spent more time digging a bit, but I&#039;m not really a Mac man and have only seen the glossy brochure for the iPhone.

Thanks for pointing at Gruber&#039;s article. When seen in that light, the press release does sound really condescending and I&#039;m sure Apple can expect a massive backlash from the announcement. 

btw, it&#039;s nice to meet another blogger in the Isle of Man. Adding you to my blogroll ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steph: Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right. It did strike me as being a bit strange when the press release talked about &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; applications and my through were, &#8220;maybe the whole UI is one big web app&#8221;. I should have spent more time digging a bit, but I&#8217;m not really a Mac man and have only seen the glossy brochure for the iPhone.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing at Gruber&#8217;s article. When seen in that light, the press release does sound really condescending and I&#8217;m sure Apple can expect a massive backlash from the announcement. </p>
<p>btw, it&#8217;s nice to meet another blogger in the Isle of Man. Adding you to my blogroll <img src='http://www.u-g-h.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManxStef</title>
		<link>http://www.u-g-h.com/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>ManxStef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.u-g-h.com/index.php/2007/06/12/apple-in-the-news/#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the iPhone&#039;s &quot;API&quot; is a bit of a misnomer: basically they&#039;re saying you can run web apps on it through Safari, which was already pretty obvious and a massive disappointment.  After Apple announced that the iPhone would run OS X every Mac developer out there got excited at the possibilities, but instead of a proper API and supporting framework they went and announced this.  Not happy!  See Gruber&#039;s take on the WWDC keynote here, he captures the consensus pretty well:
http://daringfireball.net/2007/06/wwdc_2007_keynote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the iPhone&#8217;s &#8220;API&#8221; is a bit of a misnomer: basically they&#8217;re saying you can run web apps on it through Safari, which was already pretty obvious and a massive disappointment.  After Apple announced that the iPhone would run OS X every Mac developer out there got excited at the possibilities, but instead of a proper API and supporting framework they went and announced this.  Not happy!  See Gruber&#8217;s take on the WWDC keynote here, he captures the consensus pretty well:<br />
<a  href="http://daringfireball.net/2007/06/wwdc_2007_keynote" rel="nofollow">http://daringfireball.net/2007/06/wwdc_2007_keynote</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
